Nauseous, you're viewing this in awfully simplistic terms. There are more than the two choices you stated - extremes of black and white - one being to hang your head in shame, the other being to form a revolutionary armed resistance or something. What about the whole spectrum of possibilities that lies in between those poles? What about at least just informing yourself as best you can, so that you are not blindly supporting things which on closer analysis, you might discover actually go against your own beliefs and all you hold dear? Anyway, i just came online to post this...
Here's my sprawling reply to Jefe. "Nursey, that was all very interesting but I hope you'll agree, the more outrageous a story or news item is, the harder it is for most people to take it at face value and assume it's true, especially of the only source for the information is Rense or some other conspiracy theorist site." Yeah i know, but you aren't going to get an article like that in any mainstream news. And any independant site that contradicts the official version of events is going to be considered a conspiracy site (even if they don't go near the wilder sounding stuff like Rense does), so it's a catch-22. "Please don’t be offended but I doubt that most of the information your post is accurate. Can you back it up with confirmation from a more credible source?" No offence taken, you're entitled to your opinion. What do you consider a 'credible source'? I know Barry there won't believe anything i could show you unless it came straight from the mouths of the authoritative droids that front his favourite government propaganda outlets, which to me have absolutely no credibility. But i'll do my best. I've provided info from several sites, some 'straightlaced', some a bit conspiratorial, just to give a broader perspective, and here's a link to a copy of the declassified information that often gets referred to: NSSM 200: IMPLICATIONS OF WORLDWIDE POPULATION GROWTH FOR U.S. SECURITY AND OVERSEAS INTERESTS December 10, 1974 CLASSIFIED BY Harry C. Blaney, III SUBJECT TO GENERAL DECLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 11652 AUTOMATICALLY DOWN- GRADED AT TWO YEAR INTERVALS AND DECLASSIFIED ON DECEMBER 31, 1980. 'Social Hygiene'...nice fascistic sounding name! "The German term Rassenhygiene or race hygiene was broader than the word eugenics..." Club of Rome But to add a little fuel to your fire, do you think that, if population reduction is a priority of the US government’s current administration, that might explain the 3 day delay in any kind of a response to the recent tragedy in Asia? Seems to me that if population reduction is something in which they’re interested, that would have been the perfect move. What does this suggest? "Another thing to consider is, how would such a policy survive thirty years and how many different administrations. Who was president in 1974? Nixon?" If anyone really believes that the surface of politics that is presented to the public is the full story, they are sadly deluded. What we get to see is only the tip of the iceberg.
One of the best and most credible sources of information, and presumably the least biased, is articles and research done by professors at accredited colleges. I do not restrict this to just American Universities. Most of these professors have to publish to survive, and they are under the scrutiny of the peers to be accurate. Do not assume that these professors are going to hide anything. Many, if not most, are very bright and very liberal. Many, especially in other countries, loathe the US. The system of peer accountability makes material published by professors a little higher quality than things published without. I can accept scholarly work that criticizes America. I just have problems with wild speculations and things that can't be authenticated. Missed you lately. Can I send a donation through paypal to help with the phone bill? (or would that be aiding and abetting the enemy?) Barry
Ughh...i don't think it would be *appropriate* for you to ~slip a wad~ into my !PP accunt!, but thanks all the same!
pop goes the weasel From Nurzi's post: "Quote: John D. Rockefeller 3rd (Disinfopedia) "The young Rockefeller also developed his own interests. Through his work as a member of the board of directors of the Bureau of Social Hygiene (to which he was appointed in 1928), Rockefeller began a lifelong commitment to the issues of population control and birth control "With the founding of the Population Council in 1952, Rockefeller hoped to bring the problem of overpopulation to global attention. His travels throughout Asia convinced him that population growth had to be checked if underdeveloped countries were to achieve political stability. In 1970, President Richard M. Nixon appointed Rockefeller to the chairmanship of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future 'Social Hygiene'...nice fascistic sounding name! "The German term Rassenhygiene or race hygiene was broader than the word eugenics..." Club of Rome But to add a little fuel to your fire, do you think that, if population reduction is a priority of the US government’s current administration, that might explain the 3 day delay in any kind of a response to the recent tragedy in Asia? Seems to me that if population reduction is something in which they’re interested, that would have been the perfect move. What does this suggest? " So who the fuck cares? There are too many people in the world right now. Too much competition for jobs and resources. If some cabal is concocting a remedy, I don't care. Why should you, Nurzi. Your posts and links suggest there is nothing to be done about the master plan by the powerful Illuminati or Club of Rome anyway. CULL the fucken herd.
