Marines involved in the Haditha incident are innocent

Discussion in 'More Serious Topics' started by Joeslogic, May 31, 2006.

  1. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
    Thats what Marines are trained to do kill people.
     
  2. diogenes

    diogenes New Member

    Messages:
    2,881
    That much more reason to believe they may have accidentally killed un-involved civilians.
     
  3. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
    War is a bitch I recomend any wemon or children that know there asshole brothers and shitbag fathers are burying explosive devices and waiting for American convoys to drive by to run not walk to the nearest possible place and let the Americans know. Turn the scumbags that place their familly in jepordy in to the American troops.
     
  4. diogenes

    diogenes New Member

    Messages:
    2,881
    Irrelevant. You're assuming they knew. That's a slippery slope.
     
  5. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
    The 12 year old girl said she knew that was part of the whole testimony against the Marines. She said they knew and were watching she was one of the survivors. But I got to say the blood splatters that were in the video were not reminiscent of "execution style murders she was coached on that the evidence as far as I can tell does not match up. Like I said that Taxi of "collage students" was no coincidence. These were journalism student’s enroute to do stories on the bombing they knew of in advance. The follow up journalism student that conveniently happened to be there with his camera coached the little girl.
     
  6. diogenes

    diogenes New Member

    Messages:
    2,881
    Possibly, but you can't assume that. There are other testimony and evidence that is important.
     
  7. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
    So tell that to John Shitbag Murtha. He says the Marines are guilty and George Bush is to blame.
     
  8. diogenes

    diogenes New Member

    Messages:
    2,881
    Which he has evidence to support that position.
     
  9. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
    He has no evidence till he has seen and heard all of the evidence. Of course the hate America left is just about to pee its pants with anticipation and oh so eager to slam some American military ass with a legal suit and they have already before really hearing the evidence placed themselves into a position where they have a vested interest in the Military being guilty. That mere fact puts into question anything they are saying. They want it and are hoping for it so much they can't stand to keep their mouth shut and not rush to judgment. I'm saying without knowing the facts that the other side of the story not being told paints a compelling picture that if guilty they may at best be eligible for 72 hours restriction to barracks. Do to the extenuating circumstance. Not to mention the shaky evidence against them.
     
  10. diogenes

    diogenes New Member

    Messages:
    2,881
    Then once again I'll point out that your mouth never should have opened about the topic. He has much more evidence then you do.
     
  11. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
    Damn Dio your apparently more knowledgable than all of us. You know what John Shitbag Murtha knows?

    Please do tell us what he knows so that we can make honest and educated decisions also before an investigation of the facts.
     
  12. diogenes

    diogenes New Member

    Messages:
    2,881
    What you're attempting to tell me is that you think you know more about on the ground affairs in Iraq then John Murtha does? I like how you get to rush to judgement, and come up with just about any scenario to support your position. But John Murtha says something about soldiers possibly killing civilians, and all of a sudden he's a giant shitbag. You neo-con puppets are an interesting group.
     
  13. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
    A rush to judgement is just that Dio a rush to judgement. Is mine bad and John's good?
     
  14. diogenes

    diogenes New Member

    Messages:
    2,881
    You're saying that John Murtha is a shitbag for making a statement about the incident without knowing all of the facts, which the investigation is still pending so he might be right about what happened, but you're making statements without knowing the facts. It therefore follows from your reasoning that you are also a shitbag. You also said that John Murtha should keep his mouth shut since he didn't know all of the facts. Yet you've made categorical statements without knowing all of the facts. Therefore you should keep your mouth shut. See where this is going?
     
  15. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
    I see exactly where it is going and yes backed into a corner I have taken a shitbag approach. If what you call a shitbag approach is the standing up for the ideal of innocent until prooven guilty. As opposed to "The SOBs are guilty and need to be hung, and its all because of George Bush" approach. I laid out a scenario that is likely accuyrate.
    Jhohn Murtha's scanario of "They got mad and killed people (WTF styyle is it?) execution style" whichg is based on the words of a 12 year Scumbag that was agianst the troops and participated in the roadside bomb.

    O did I say John Murtha? I ment John Shitbag Murtha.
     
  16. diogenes

    diogenes New Member

    Messages:
    2,881
    Yeah, pretty much. Practice what you preach.
     
  17. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
    Your right there with the media take part of my quote it means one thing take the quote as a whole it means something different all together.


    NOW : BAM! READ THIS BITCH!

    Pretty much matches my make believe scenario doesn't it? The job for the media is now to try and make the impression that a Hummvee being blown up and recieving fire from the direction of a house does not give Marines the right to enact rules of engagement with enemy.
     
  18. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
  19. XerxesX

    XerxesX New Member

    Messages:
    745
    You`r source is tainted Joe. I just checked it. The editorial line would have gone well down in PyongYang.

    I read through Coulter on fragging Murtha and they "interpret" like true blackcloaks.

    "The reason soldirs invented fragging"
    Why not;
    "The reason priests invented burnings"
    It`s embarrasing isnt it? To be defended by illiterate literati.

    Please, please. Can the cons produce ONE good writer.

    Heres the answer to A.Coulter ( Liberal church of the godless )?
    You give away your money, bitch, then you can follow baby Jesus.
    And no little missus. Jesus wasnt the pro-invasion guy.
    That`s Muhammed ( pbuh ).

    Who is the god of materialism ? Satanist scum Coulter knows deep in her heart.

    Check it out folks "Breaking news, buy Ann`s book"
    Why not a bikini-series :lol:
    She could post here, but she would be no match for Nursey.
     
  20. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
    I'd like to shove a frag grenade up Murthas fat backside myself personally. The comments work great for publicity the book is just another one on the best seller list.

    You got her all wrong really Xerx and she is a sweetheart just a good ole'girl.



    And Murtha is an idiot was probably public schooled.

    Annie would not lower herself to the level of this forum.
     

Share This Page