Manipulative, scheming whores

Discussion in 'General Mayhem' started by Nursey, Aug 17, 2007.

  1. ucicare

    ucicare Active Member

    Messages:
    5,606
    It's Sun, 26 Aug 2007 22:59:35 -0400. Do you know where you are?
    [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Did you know... The U.S. Government spent $277,000 on pickle research in 1993.[/FONT]


    Eat a Ghershwin Nursey.
     
  2. ucicare

    ucicare Active Member

    Messages:
    5,606
  3. Nursey

    Nursey Super Moderator

    Messages:
    7,378
    I think what you mean is 'gherkin'. Fine, just as long as it isn't protruding from your trousers. Speaking of gherkins, how about you sit on this, you big, bald, repressed "youth pastor" (homo).
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2007
  4. MAJ Havoc

    MAJ Havoc Active Member

    Messages:
    3,123
    As a child of the 70's, I wore long hair and as a beautiful child, I was mistaken for a girl all the time. It only bothered me when it happened once after I turned 11. Once I began military school and got my hair cut, it passed but I don't think it caused my any further issues.

    I thought if a woman batted her eyes at a man and got what she wanted, she was playing on the weakness and stupidity of the man. That makes her the smarter one in understanding her opponent. Plus, I support the right of a woman to choose to be a subservient whore if that's what she wants :)

    I am intimidated by a man who is smarter than I but society allows that. A strong woman (or "bitch" by such standards) poses an even greater threat because she is the eternal underdog (don't read another "bitch" pun there).

    I think women in power are accepted if the woman is unattractive (looks more like a man.) Hot babes, um, attractive women have a harder time being taken seriously because of man's inherent instinct to "weasel into their cooters."
     
  5. Nursey

    Nursey Super Moderator

    Messages:
    7,378
    I don't see long hair on a boy as 'gayifying', my point was that if it was foisted on a kid as a result of an overly P.C. parent it would be just as damaging as the opposite.

    That's not manipulation, that's sexual communication - flirting. And being subservient to a man - if it's the man you have chosen to be with - isn't a problem to me, it's using subservience in a calculated manner to get your way in day to day life that irks me. That is just cold, cynical manipulation.

    Yes, females do develop their cunning more as a result of not being given as much power. As a female, it can be quite uncomfortable meeting other females as the majority are pretty scheming, males on the whole being far more straightforward and above board. It's always a huge relief to meet other females who are just like me and know exactly what i'm talking about. Like Nauseous, for example.
     
  6. MAJ Havoc

    MAJ Havoc Active Member

    Messages:
    3,123
    No, the gayifying was when she dressed me in knickers because she thought it was cute. That's why I killed her.

    I don't know if there are many females "just like you" but I suppose your BFF Nauseous and you share some common ground aside from Imp stoning.
     
  7. Nursey

    Nursey Super Moderator

    Messages:
    7,378
    It's like...you know me! :) What i mean is it's always a relief to meet other women with a firm backbone and no scheming competitiveness towards other women simply for being female.
     
  8. DangerousD

    DangerousD New Member

    Messages:
    680
    ....;)
     
  9. Nursey

    Nursey Super Moderator

    Messages:
    7,378
    I see the point you are trying to ram home here. However, 'us Brits' are known for our "stiff upper lip" approach to such pertinently probing angles, and so i bid you good day!
     
  10. DangerousD

    DangerousD New Member

    Messages:
    680
    a tighter hole?
     
  11. Nursey

    Nursey Super Moderator

    Messages:
    7,378

    Barry is looking suitably dejected.
     

Share This Page