DYSFUNCTIONAL COUNTRY, DYSFUNCTIONAL FAMILY

The Evidence is in

Professor Steven Jones presenting his X-ray spectrometry evidence from samples taken at the WTC site. They dramatically show a PERFECT MATCH for the highly specialized compound "thermate" (used for cutting through steel) found in the WTC debris. (And no, thermate was NOT used during the clean up operation...this stuff was in the building, and ignited, prior to collapse.) See video links

 

Ah Nursey Thermite is easy to make and very commonly known about. You can post mountains of supercilious evidence indicating intent always supplied as a one two punch a distraction ridiculousness of the first supplied thanks in large to the move-on crowd. That takes nothing away from the point Phat made. If you wanted to you could not pull it off.

Oh and if you apartment or house crashed to the ground there you would have it termite. Proof that GW sent one of his henchmen over to try and take you out. :

That shit is super easy to make and carried on a mop bucket to every janitor closet. LOL

You are so blind to what is so damn obvious. But your not the only ones look a majority of the world believes that Joe Wilson said he herd while having tea with Nigerian officials that Saddams envoy to to the region was in an attempt to negotiate another item in their massive chest of items worthwhile for barter, ..... sand I guess we know Iraq needs that. Oh and a badly forged receipt means....

Well you tell me Nursey what does it mean?

Oh and I have all the materials to make thermite in my garage. Come to think of it also in my bathroom, bedroom, car, truck. the list goes on.

 

8)

 

Lets just have a cut and paste war

http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=016182179862191393560:hx2yxincxdu

http://www.debunking911.com/

All the people who would have to be involved in order to pull this massive conspiracy off...

HA HA HA HA HA HA! ROTFL LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL OMG TISF STFU YKM LOLOLOLOL

 

Okay, I'm pretty sure everyone is familiar with the magazine popular mechanics. Here they take the time or waste the time if you will to debunk a few of the myriad of conspiracy theories put forth by tards and people looking for book deals and democratic nominations in predominantly dumbass democratic districts:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

 

Ah, i understand now why 'meeshell' is making posts that are "peer reviewed" as 'putting the commie pinko left footer cheese lovin caliphate surrenderists in their place'!!... (but is actually merely spouting the tired old rhetoric of the unwitting empirical apologist) He/she's not actually following the thread! If it* was it'd know that mr chertoffs familial link with the architects of 911 compromise the validity of 'popular mechanics'.. Anywby i had a poin t but im typing this on my phone in the pub and am apparantly being ignorant so im off its probably costing me loads anyway . . . Fuck off

 

Here's your brethren conspiracy theorist (only he is much more prolific than you with pg after pg of rambling nonsense) interacting with the al quaeda and al quaeda sympathizers some of whom pretend to agree others being insulted that anyone who say it wasn't the "mujhadeen" who were responsible for "this great act putting a spear in the heart of the" agains the kuffar pigs:

http://forums.islamicawakening.com/showthread.php?t=45

http://forums.islamicawakening.com/forumdisplay.php?f=19

 

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

 

I will have to give dan kudos on the cartoons. Those were very interesting. You know, I havent heard any rebutals in a while. I am guessing the Neo-Cons found the flat that Nursey shares with her other conspiracies and she has been dining on the best food in camp gitmo........... :

 

When you're ready to have a calm, rational debate i'll see some point in continuing. But there's not going to be any of that while you all view it so competitively.

 

But when your argument isnt rational, then how can we have a rational debate? The simple logistics of such an 'inside' job are enormous and more than highly improbable.

 

It's a perfect example of the old saying "The pot calling the kettle black" Nursey.

BTW I got a Photoshop question.

 

pfff, thats a bit rich coming from 'the hypocrite', you're the perfect example of the 'say one thing do another' corporate america, I bet you're a lawyer, they're usually assholes.

 

............wah, wahh, waaah, wah wah

 

I dont know about joe, but I am not a lawyer, and yes I am an ASSHOLE.

Example:

I was going to one of our off-site processing facilities to work on an automation project. When I got to the parking lot someone was parked in my spot. Not worried about it I just pulled into one of the reserved spots across the lot. Well this security gaurd runs out as I am getting my computer out of the backseat of my truck and says, "Hey you arent allowed to park there, you need to move your truck"

To which I replied, "YOU GET THAT MOTHERFUCKER OUT OF MY PARKING SPOT AND I WILL MOVE MY DAMN TRUCK"

Then I closed my door, locked my truck and walked off.

Granted it wasnt his fault somone parked in my spot, but it is his job to make sure no one else does, or have them move.

 

Lawyers are ass holes they are a major part of the problem with this country.

Oh and yeah I'm fully capable however of being an asshole myself. But trust me if you were in need of a hand, assistance, advice, a kind word, moral support, a smile, whatever you would do well to be in my circle of friends.

 

I just don't want to be "pivot man."

 

Hell we all eat asparagus no volunteers for that job. Back to being an asshole.

 

It just becomes pointless when the whole discussion is overshadowed by character attacks, blanket ridicule of the whole subject, subject diversions, irrelevant crap being thrown in to muddy the points being made etc. You might successfully silence the opposition, but only by derailing the argument, which isn't much of an achievement.


Common derailing tactic.

As you go out of your way to remind us, you are incapable of viewing things with an open mind, and refuse to entertain the possibility that you are wrong for one minute, not even hypothetically for the sake of argument.

A good argument to support the controlled demolition theory was made, yet got quickly lost in all the crap that followed.

Your argument isn't rational. You are using an opinion of yours (what you *believe*) in one subject area to dismiss a sound conclusion (that you had no decent counterance to) in another.