821 google news results regarding the budget Google lied

Smurf :?

I'm not sure where you’re headed or coming from on that. My IE browsers home page is Google news. Ironically enough even though I do not entirely trust Google, they generally have a damn good search engine. And I think the internet crowd is actually better informed than your typical bonehead that gets all his information from TV. They would be the ones that drive the internet. Typically internet pools show a more educated view. This seems to be changing though since there is more quantity and more compelling disinformation on the net.

BTW my Firefox browsers home page is Yahoo. I do try to get some balance. But read Drudge Report at least once a day if I go online that day and here lately breitbart.com

Google just gives me a fairly accurate pulse on what sort of propaganda the world is consuming.

 

Crap! I ment drive internet searches. -and- Typically internet polls.

 

Diogenes, please do not make me completely and thoroughly own you with complete and concise scientific articles all linked together by yours truly on how strange atmospheric phenomenon coincide with awesome weather events worldwide, thusly making my point that our weather is going to shit.

At the same time, I'd also write a very complete article on why the economic depression is also almost here. I'd leave out my conspiracy bullshit, but I'll leave it up to you to decide if this all going down before 2012 and with our rich and colorful history is merely coincidence.

It would be a waste of my time, since I already know it. Being the bonehead you are though, I wouldn't consider it a complete waste of my time to hear what you guys would try to say about it.

Sadly though, it would be a long read and I know people on these forums tend to think *YAWN* when it comes to scientific or economic issues. If you promise not to do this, I'll actually write something up that is both highly enlightening and unlike my usual self.

 

Smurf it seems that your perception of the level of influence your articles have on the general forum members is a touch off. You can pull from various corners of the internet all sorts of pieces of information to backup your "We fucked up now we got to pay" theory. It’s because that is what you look for so obviously that is what you will find. Most people understand that if they want to it’s a big world out there and a lot of information to cut and paste. I could do the same thing and probably bring up tons of information to support a theory that soybeans are the cause of all our worldly problems by way of introducing it into pig feed and causing a new harmful type of flatulence.

It has got to make sense and bring into account apposing theories as well as admit the weaker points of its own ideology. You take the whole scientific process of discovery and turn it on its ear all the while believing that you now "own" someone.

 

No you couldn't, and that's a stupid comparison anyways, since recorded supersurges in pig flatulence can't be linked to hundreds of thousands of air to ground lightning bolts across the Australian outback, but I would think an x-class solar flare and geomagnetic storm can, right? The difference between what I would do and whatever the hell your talking about is that you'd see the direct connection between these events and the earth. Then you'd understand how our weather and earth work. Then you'd stop and wonder why our weather is acting weird, and that it's not some stupid cycle shit because what the hell causes the cycle? What I'll be shoving in your face!

On top of that, you can find some articles to support how the economy is doing great. But then you'd be an idiot to believe them. The economy is doomed, and that can proven absolutely.

 

Aww shit! ..... now I'm owned

 

You need to get a job at the Weekly World News, you crazy fuck. Crazy lightning storms, those could be explained by, I don't know, the static electricity generated by currents in a dynamic fluid system. That sounds a lot like our atmosphere. Oh shit, that is how lightning occurs in our atmosphere. Silly me, and I thought I was gonna get owned. You really should get a job at the Weekly World News though, then you could "own" me with random factoids and stories about how George W. Bush is controlling the weather by using an alien that gets blown by an intern.

 

WOW, hundreds of thousands of lightning bolts, air to ground... How the fuck does that kind of energy get built up you idiot? The awesome display of energy in this lightning storm can't be simply explained away by your idiot ass dynamic fluid model, because it doesn't compensate for external forces. At the same damn time you had awesome rolling fog that enveloped the Great nation of China, as well as awesome blizzards that blacked out europe and all sorts of sharks and whales beaching themselves.

Fucking knownothing. I'm going to enjoy typing that shit up, so your faggot ass can rain your wisdom and knowledge of our Earth you learned in highschool down on me thusly proving that these are mere coincidences. Bitch ass bitch.

 

Well for one thing if its a cycle, The weathermen and all the ohers would have did a model by now comparing it to past models to find the cycle.

Since none of the models they have looks like anything on record this can not be called a cycle by what we define as a cycle.

Yes I agree that the earth is an old mud ball and this might have happened before at some point in time. But I doubt any human was on the planet at the time.

Hell for all we know Dino's got whiped out by the greenhouse effect from all the meth in there giant piles of shit. Anyone think of that one?

 

Naw naw naw. If it is a cycle, then shits about to change, and shit changing sucks because we built up this 6.5 billion population on the assumption shit wouldn't change. What a stupid thing to do, since we'd only built it up in the past 100 years. The Earth's human carrying capacity will greatly diminish, and you know what that means... Oh yeah... raping and pillaging...

 

Assless chaps and guys with mohawks?

 

Correction: Assless Chaps and guys with Gats.

 

Not true Grim. The reason they are unable to develope accurate weather models is because there are too many variables to put in to get an accurate ourput. Think about this, you have a giant globe, surrounded by a fluid mass, that is heated by an external source, an internal source to a much smaller degree, with multiple surface textures, along with variations in composition, density, refractory indexes, etc.

When you heat air it moves, and in a simple system you can predict how it's going to move. The more complex the system, the less accurate the predictions become over time. That being said, think about how complicated the model I just put before you is. Do you honestly think anyone has the processing power to compute all of those variables, on a global scale. That would probably require thousands of peta-byte's just to calcute out to a day with 100% accuracy, not even mentioning the amount of information capacity required to run an accurate model years into the future. Do you see the problem now?

 

Shut the fuck up douche. Ol' Benjamin Franklin was able to predict weather in his area pretty damn well. It was pretty much a pattern, didn't he predict it for the year? or years? I dunno, but I know he also predicted snow on the 4th of July and it happened in the northern areas. It was a joke, anyways, but hey it was predicted!

It's tougher to predict because the shits getting crazier, they can't even keep a weeklong forecast straight anymore. Plus you're forgetting the suns impact on our weather, which had it's cycles and was pretty steady but now it's not, somethings changed with it. Or maybe you didn't forget to include that because you're a dumbass ignorant douche.

 

Smurf is very correct on the not being able to keep a week forcast correct.

Just this weekend they called for it too be around 38 degrees on Saturday. This was on the 10 oclock news Friday. The next day it was around 60.

Jan in my area this year felt like March, In fact this time last year we where having freak Ice Storms.

It does not take a very smart person to see something is a miss. From the Hurricanes to everything else.

We are in for a shit storm and it will not be pretty.

 

For me, the idea of a creation is not conceivable without invoking the necessity of design. One cannot be exposed to the law and order of the universe without concluding that there must be design and purpose behind it all. In the world around us, we can behold the obvious manifestations of an ordered, structured plan or design. We can see the will of the species to live and propagate. And we are humbled by the powerful forces at work on a galactic scale, and the purposeful orderliness of nature that endows a tiny and ungainly seed with the ability to develop into a beautiful flower. The better we understand the intricacies of the universe and all it harbors, the more reason we have found to marvel at the inherent design upon which it is based.

Many men who are intelligent and of good faith say they cannot visualize a Designer. Well, can a physicist visualize an electron? The electron is materially inconceivable and yet it is so perfectly known through its effects that we use it to illuminate our cities, guide our airlines through the night skies and take the most accurate measurements. What strange rationale makes some physicists accept the inconceivable electrons as real while refusing to accept the reality of a Designer on the ground that they cannot conceive Him?

I am afraid that, although they really do not understand the electron either, they are ready to accept it because they managed to produce a rather clumsy mechanical model of it borrowed from rather limited experience in other fields, but they would not know how to begin building a model of a God.

 

February over here is in the 80's. I'm getting ready to best out my swim trunks and go snorkeling before the depression hits and fucks with my mojo. 8)

 

Smurf-lapper wrote:
the idea of a creation is not conceivable without invoking the necessity of design. One cannot be exposed to the law and order of the universe without concluding that there must be design and purpose behind it all.

It is solved with chaosmath and those nice thingies on the net called fractals. With them as a model its possible to envision an creator without any design or plan.

Noticed how fractals recreate the same pattern on different levels. And society likewise. "Head of state" "Heart of the nation" "The long arm of the law" And our beloved "asshole" Hm :roll:

The Gaia-theory for instance

 

I can't help that that's just the way things are. If you saw how something worked without knowing the specifics, you still would have a general idea. The same ol' patterns will always be found, and without being forced to otherwise, an unchecked, unlearned human race will always fall into the same patterns.

 

Now the "force" went the other way Smurf. The "force" seemed to be the bookburning and willfull denial of knowledge. Here it has turned. Are you opperating with two factors using "force" ?