Depends if she is a democrat or a republican it's all really very simple. If she were a democrat she would be crammed right down the worlds throat.
If she is elected, I will join Smurf in the "end of the world is here" rhetoric. But one thing I see - If she is elected she can carry on her husbands tradition of having sex with young female interns.
Hillary Clinton running in 2008 is the best thing that can happen for GOP campaign fundraising. The whole idea of the inevitable Nobel Peace prize. The MTV get out and vote for the "cool chick" ads. The pundits from out of the wood work and eyewitness stories of extreme charm, brilliance. The perfect combination of charm, style and when needed a streak of firmness that will "slap you right in line". Anyone who says anything negative about a policy decision as a "femophob" a new term that will be coined specifically for the purpose of being used against her political adversaries; fear of brilliant and powerful women. Those on the conservative side know well how the media can take a moron and make them a hero. They have seen it before and have a low tolerance for bullshit. The mere thought of it has them instinctively reaching for their wallet.
Funny, I remember "Time" declaring President Bush the man of the year not too long ago. But that was just liberal media bias trying to make him look like a white version of the coco-crispies monkey.
Yeah facts they are quite a bitch arn't they. http://www.time.com/time/searchresu...e+matchallpartial&N=46&Ns=p_date_sort|1&Nty=1 60 front covers mentioning Bush Jr. and Senior. 90 percent negative. As opposed to Hillarys ass lick articals. Your an idiot.
Not really, they question if he's leading the country in the right direction, which is the job of the fourth estate. I doubt you threw much of a fit when the media was all over Clinton for NAFTA.
The only NAFTA negatives were directed towards at Congress during mid term elections no one pointed a finger at Clinton. As far as NAFTA goes I say if we are going to have an open society. And if we want to take real steps towards resolving the immigration policy. We need for out neighboring countries to be stable democracies with a healthy economy. Not third world unstable hell holes with people flocking to U.S. to get away. Or go the other route and follow the Pat Buchannan idea and close the boarders and become self reliant to the extent that we can.
