Would that be a fruedian slip?? I dont think Nauseaous could have sex for 45 minutes cause she'd need a poo break. Ive been around the block a time or two, and Ive never met a woman that has been in a hurry to get it over with. I guess if it's 45 minutes of jack hammering then I could see there being an issue. I think it says a lot about your 'style' if a womans asked you to hurry up.
Plain and simple: I'm not a patient person. And whatever, women lie terribly about sex to men, but get some of us together and you would be surprised about what we really think about you guys and sex. And yes, if you were fucking like you've just been released from prison, then 45 minutes is way too much.
That's not exactly what i said. Instability and promiscuity typically characterise homosexual relationships. Generally speaking, gays have a lot more focus on the superficial, physical aspects of a relationship than heterosexual relationships. Women are (generally) more sensitive regarding sex. It puts them in a physically vulnerable position, particularly should the purpose of sex - procreation - be fulfilled. And although modern, technologically 'advanced' humans are changing due to our power over nature, it's still not enough to completely override one of the most fundamental aspects of our nature. Though there are more and more heterosexuals who are becoming like typical gays in their purely self-serving attitudes towards sex. This is due to contraception, but also due to the increasingly hedonistic attitudes towards sex that are being portrayed in the media these days. "...we think of homosexuality in terms of same-sex attraction. If we redefine it as inability to bond with a member of the opposite sex for purposes of procreation, the gay trend is clear. (I am not blaming gays; I am talking about a developmental disorder that is being spread throughout society." I'm not saying there isn't a problem. But their answer to it is just to avoid addressing the issue and finding a same sex partner for fulfilling their needs. Like dancing with two left feet instead of mastering the difficulty they have of getting left and right to work together. Or trying to experience the full beauty of a rainbow when you only have one end of the spectrum within your powers of perception. And although many gay men have experienced sex with a woman, perhaps they have gone for the sort of woman they have been conditioned into thinking they should find, rather than someone who they genuinely have something in common with, making a proper evaluation of heterosex impossible. Some women are totally superficial themselves, they might just behave like a lump of meat waiting to be 'serviced'. Or maybe the emotional needs of a woman were too reminiscent of an overbearing mother, or something. Or maybe some gay men fear of losing control of their existence, which heterosexual sex can evoke due to the powers of procreation, which amounts to fear of fully experiencing life. There could be countless variations. But i think it most probably all stems from a psychological problem which results from our dysfunctional society. Foregoing asparagus is hardly going to make much difference to anyone's life. But i don't see how a human missing out on experiencing what it is to be human in it's fullest complexity can be reduced to such a trivial level. To experience the whole picture, the fullest range of energies has to be available, which requires both genders to unite. Some people's instinct, then, is to fuck chickens. Is that just how nature intended it? But there is a pro-gay agenda. I believe in tolerance for people's differences, society should always strive to be humane, but now it's gone too far the other way. It is being foisted upon us as normality. Here Come The Lesbian Rangers! "When a grouchy queen tells her layabout son that it's time for him to marry, he sighs, "Very well, Mother.... I must say, though, I've never cared much for princesses." His young page winks. Several unsatisfactory bachelorettes visit the castle before "Princess Madeleine and her brother, Prince Lee" appear in the doorway. The hero is smitten at once. "What a wonderful prince!" he and Prince Lee both exclaim, as a shower of tiny Valentine hearts flutters between them. First-time co-authors and artists de Hann and Nijland matter-of-factly conclude with the royal wedding of "King and King," the page boy's blushing romance with the leftover princess and the assurance that "everyone lives happily ever after." Or is it that they just think they're happier in the way an agoraphobic who never ventures outdoors is 'happy' when they are able to stay inside for years? I take people on an individual basis. And if someone is a bullshit-free individual who i can relate to on an equal basis and isn't harming anyone, that is fine by me. The best gay is one who you wouldn't even guess was gay due to the fact they aren't pushing it in your face in any way (or pushing their bottoms out provocatively). In fact, with the right shades, the non-gay looking gay can be pretty damn sexy. They are probably more into frot-to-frot cock wrestling in their super-slick cutting edge bachelor apartment listening to Laurent Garnier than chocolate taint licking fuck-buggery. I hope so, anyway. That they are more given over to persuing 'pleasures of the flesh' than forming a 'sacred union of opposites', preventing them experiencing the power of true and complete unity? It depends on whether two people just have an agreement in order to facilitate mutual usage of each other in order to each keep themselves 'serviced', or if they actually love each other and desire to make each other happy. I'm not saying that all gays are into mutual usage or that all heterosexuals are into loving relationships. I mean, let's take you for example. You are coming across like a superficial, mutual using fag as regards your relationship. You describe a stark, physical, pretty 'mechanical' process, with not an awful lot else involved. I'm not saying it has to be a profoundly deep and meaningful, selfless experience every single time, but come on! At least occasionally. It makes sense that your brother, who has been brought up with the same influences and background is gay. It's probably the same influences that have produced your obsession with medical conditions resulting in hypochondria and OCD etc. I appreciate science and logic, but not to the exclusion of all else, and you strike me as someone who views everything in a purely logical, scientific way. Life doesn't conform to such limitive, manmade rules, so to only use these rules to interpret our world, we are unable to fully relate to or express all aspects of ourselves, creating blockages and neuroses in our personality that find release through unbalanced behaviour. Many people, gay and heterosexual, use sex to replace love. And although a minority of gay men do love and care for each other and are faithful, it is still just the equivalent of learning to dance pretty well with two left feet, but still not experiencing absolute balance on all levels. Of course, there are different levels to sex. Sometimes it can be far more tipped in the physical direction than other times in which case it will tend to be over with in about 15 minutes. Or in some cases, entirely physical, a bit like mutual masterbation. "Men and women are demeaned when they seek sex merely as physical release. Let's face it. Most of us have been demeaned." But if you were to do deep meditation and tantric excercises, as has been taught for thousands of years in the spiritually attuned east, or take the fast track, easy (but not so wholesome) route with mind expanding substances, (which isn't necessary but helps dissolve barriers that arise from everyday living, the same as meditation), there are torrents of powerful, blissful energy that can be experienced, but providing you and your sexual partner are both open - down to your most vulnerable level. Selfishly self-serving attitudes will not enable you to access the same levels of bliss that a loving attitude will, because they don't enable you to transcend the limitations of your physical being, regardless of your sexuality.
Who is "they"? Heavenly messengers of God? Science? The media? Everything scientists ever say is to be automatically believed? You could use the same argument to explain what makes people more prone to being shallow or narcissistic too. Or rapists. Or more prone to violent, criminal behaviour if some scientists in Miami are to be believed.
I only care in the sense that due to a "gay mafia" excercising a gay agenda, society is becoming not just tolerant and accepting of gays, but overtly pro-gay. I'm not fearful of gays. I used to know (and believed i was friends with) quite a few gay men. It turns out they weren't interested in my friendship extending beyond the weekend parties, despite their oh-so-sincere professions of love and adoration. But they were really just acquaintences who used each other. Selfish, shallow people. There's always exceptions to every rule (even that one), but as i say, this is just generally speaking. Excellent! Caffeine jitters are what you are currently reading.
Yeah, I was kinda exagerating and bragging a little, my average time is high, yes, but I wont pump away while she lies there like a sack of spuds, occaisionally glancing at the TV remote and looking at her nails. If she wanted to finish, I would finish off myself, but the only reason I have to do it myself (or that I'm taking long in the first place) is that I am desensitized to the sexual act and I am ok with nakedness. Women don't get me horny if they lie there and expect me to practice the missionary, its the worst position anyway. and I have said this before, but I do it like a porn star, if I get a dirty bitch that knows what to do for once, believe me I'll probably be under the 'average' 5-10 minutes. As to the point.. I have long since associated 'in your face' gayness and the worst kind of metrosexuality with a high level of vanity. Yes it is very apparent, that materialism. competition and the needing of acceptance from peers help define some forms of homosexuality, among many other factors of course, upbringing, social interactions etc.
Meditation? You're starting to sound like the creepy teacher in high school that made us meditate in class and used therapeutic touch. No seriously, I don't even want to touch that last paragraph right now. It brings too many weird images to my head... especially coming from you who always struck me as some sort of sadist.
Well, I wasn't being totally fair. I am totally asexual these days much to my boyfriend's dispair. It's like something in my head is broken, so I have taken all of the "luster" out of "love" and maybe I am partially jealous of people with a normal sex drive. All I can seem to do is remember the good old days... I'm going to get flamed hard for this, but oh, well... It's the truth.
Shouldn't this be in your lonely hearts ad? And it sounds like your 45 minute Casanova pornstar style isn't leaving you feeling entirely fulfilled either.
And those of you who have never heard this story, please read it. It is sadly interesting. I watched the documentary some time ago. http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/reimer/
Yeah well, it wouldn't hurt to be on there, but seeing as I can never really hope for a woman that can both satisfy my sophisticated (dirty) sexual appetite and be a long term friend and partner, I'll have to choose love first, and satisfy myself if the need arises. I really just need a fuck buddy who is also a friend, thats the simplest way of putting it.
Am I the only one that feels that Nursey has left the building, and someone else has taken her persona? I do not believe that the current Nursey is the Nursey I know and Love. Somebody (damn you Pimp) has broken her heart again, or it's just not her.
