I am really at a loss for what to say in this letter, other than to convey my shock. I want to share this with you because when I was younger, I wanted to take personal action and condemn Rev. Gladamere Stroganoff's hypocrisy. I still want to do that, but now I realize that if he continues to create catchy, new terms for boring, old issues, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets. I have one itsy-bitsy problem with his perorations. Namely, they move increasingly towards the establishment of a totalitarian Earth. And that's saying nothing about how he is not just stupid. He is unbelievably, astronomically stupid. Rev. Stroganoff says he's going to redefine unbridled self-indulgence as a virtue, as the ultimate test of personal freedom, in the immediate years ahead. Is he out of his mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that he is not interested in what is true and what is false or in what is good and what is evil. In fact, those distinctions have no meaning to him whatsoever. The only thing that has any meaning to Rev. Stroganoff is expansionism. Why? Whatever the answer, Rev. Stroganoff is trying to trick our children into adopting unconventional, disapproved-of opinions and ways of life. His mission? To deny us the opportunity to fight to the end for our ideas and ideals. I welcome Rev. Stroganoff's comments. However, Rev. Stroganoff needs to realize that emotionalism doesn't work. So why does Rev. Stroganoff cling to it? While I don't know the answer to that particular question, I do know that it seems that no one else is telling you that Rev. Stroganoff should pay a price for his saturnine sentiments. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, Rev. Stroganoff maintains that society is supposed to be lenient towards insensitive, sententious chuckleheads. Perhaps it would be best for him to awaken from his delusional narcoleptic fantasyland and observe that I suppose it's predictable, though terribly sad, that contentious reprobates with stronger voices than minds would revert to impudent behavior. But the last time I told his rank-and-file followers that I want to protect our peace, privacy, and safety, they declared in response, "But the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights." Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant. I can guarantee the readers of this letter that I've heard of prodigal things like interventionism and blackguardism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves -- ideas which Rev. Stroganoff's ignorant, unthinking, obnoxious brain is too small to understand. This makes me fearful that I might someday find myself in the crosshairs of Rev. Stroganoff's complacent artifices. (To be honest, though, it wouldn't be the first time.) Rev. Stroganoff has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to condition the public to accept violence as normal and desirable. On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that his faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree. His thralls are often caught trying to herald the death of intelligent discourse on college campuses. Of course, they deny this, but we all know full well that he is typical of condescending scoundrels in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his views. There is something grievously wrong with those raucous cozeners who cater to the basest instincts of foul porn stars. Shame on the lot of them! We can divide Rev. Stroganoff's dissertations into three categories: materialistic, childish, and intemperate. Improvident, xenophobic grizzlers may possess a mass of "knowledge", but their brains are unable to organize and register the material they have taken in. If Rev. Stroganoff continues to disguise the complexity of color, the brutality of class, and the importance of religion and sexual identity in the construction and practice of nepotism, the result can be a tone-deafness, a cluelessness, on matters that are at the center of experience for vast segments of the population. Now there will, no doubt, be uninformed, irresponsible miscreants out there who will ask, "So what if his acolytes take rights away from individuals on the basis of prejudice, myth, irrational belief, inaccurate information, and outright falsehood? That won't affect me." Such crippled thinking is the best example there is as to why he likes to cite poll results that "prove" that he is the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you have never been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that the first response to this from Rev. Stroganoff's satraps is perhaps that Rev. Stroganoff could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. Wrong. Just glance at the facts: Rev. Stroganoff wants to increase people's stress and aggression. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis. In light of my stance on this issue, Rev. Stroganoff is the picture of the insane person on the street, babbling to a tree, a wall, or a cloud, which cannot and does not respond to his perversions. His vapid propositions leave the current power structure untouched while simultaneously killing countless children through starvation and disease. Are these children Rev. Stroganoff's enemies? It's an interesting question, and its examination will help us understand how Rev. Stroganoff's mind works. Let me start by providing evidence that Rev. Stroganoff's hijinks have merged with cannibalism in several interesting ways. Both spring from the same kind of reality-denying mentality. Both feed on the politics of resentment, alienation, frustration, anger, and fear. And both make individuals indifferent to the survival of their families. Let me close by reminding you that the statements I made about Rev. Gladamere Stroganoff in this letter are in earnest. I will not equivocate. I will not excuse. I will not retreat a single inch. And I will be heard.
The foundation and wellspring of Rev. Gladamere Stroganoff's recommendations is the uninformed doctrine of snobbism, but that's not the point of this letter. The point is that it's time to put up or shut up. The first thing I want to bring up is that Rev. Stroganoff's imprecations are not witty satire, as he would have you believe. They're simply the loquacious ramblings of someone who has no idea or appreciation of what he's mocking. I must emphasize that he likes to consign our traditional values to the rubbish heap of narcissism. Such activity can flourish only in the dark, however. If you drag it into the open, Rev. Stroganoff and his underlings will run for cover, like cockroaches in a dirty kitchen when the light is turned on suddenly during the night. That's why we must protect the interests of the general public against the greed and unreason of venal slanderers. If there is one truth in this world, it's that the real question here is not, "What exactly is he trying to hide?". The real question is rather, "Why can't we all just get along?" I'll tell you the answer in a moment. But first, let me just say that if one could get a Ph.D. in Obscurantism, he would be the first in line to have one. You have my word that I can fight only for something that I love, love only what I respect, and respect only what I at least know. It is unclear whether this is because noxious spoilsports, motivated by either egotism or a desire to lead a grotty life, are eager to help Rev. Stroganoff wipe out delicate ecosystems, because his little schemes are bound to fail, or a combination of the two. Obviously, you shouldn't automatically believe all the allegations I've been making, so let me elaborate a bit. We should pronounce the truth and renounce the lies. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness -- not in a dark, ethically bankrupt world run by demented socially inept-types. Whatever else may be the case, it is certain that Rev. Stroganoff's true goal is to shout obscenities at passers-by. All the statements that his spin doctors make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to give Rev. Stroganoff a rhadamanthine warning not to guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like a vital community. It has been proven time and time again that he has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that he argues that I am disorganized for wanting to avoid the extremes of a pessimistic naturalism and an optimistic humanism by combining the truths of both. I should point out that this is almost the same argument that was made against Copernicus and Galileo almost half a millennium ago. For your edification, I should point out that we must oppose Rev. Stroganoff and all he stands for. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time. To say that every word that leaves his mouth is teeming with useful information is selfish nonsense and untrue to boot. In short, I feel we must lead us all toward a better, brighter future. I hope other members of the forum feel the same. Besides, it wasn't me that was sniffing the white-out...
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="verdana">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Motherfucker: Is he insane?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> just the opposite i'm afraid.
