Anyone hear about this guy? http://optymyst.blogspot.com/2006/04/kevin-ray-underwood.html Any takes on it? I've been reading his blog and he sounded like a fairly smart, lonely guy with too much time on his hands. I wouldn't have taken him seriously. He sounds like a lot of people here. http://futureworldruler.blogspot.com/2006_04_01_futureworldruler_archive.html Check out the archives.
Regarding Kevin Ray Underwood See what being obsessed in being cool and counter culture will get? And why call it that anyways its like alternative rock…. If every other station on the dial is playing it then WTF is so alternative? He should have just mutilated himself and posted the pics on Fugly then he would have been a hero instead of a zero.
He moans about being lonely...but after looking at that blog, he seems pretty damned popular now. And, I hate to say it, but some of the things I saw posted there since his infamy are pretty damned funny.
Remember he's innocent until proven guilty, everyone. Remember also that there is a cute and trusting ten year old girl who is no longer walking around. Which isn't funny.
I think admitting to killing, raping and planning on eating a 10 year old girl is all the proof I need.
Well, he thought Clerks was a bad movie, so they can fry him. But really, I wonder what made this guy snap? Do you think that if a girl he liked actually liked him back and he had a relationship, that this would have happened? I feel like it wouldn't have, not this year anyway. Testosterone is poison.
He could not have had a real realtionship with a girl. He is clearly a Sociopath/Psychopath. People like that do not have the capacity to bond, or to have empathy. They literally have "dead feelings." I met a lot of them during the short time I worked for a prison. They are truly frightening, not because they are vicious or evil, but because they are so devoid of the ability to feel or sense YOUR pain. Many are actually very charming, intelligent, etc. They just are emotionally dead. Stop using it for off label purposes. It wasn't FDA approved for oral injection. Oh, and I am guessing the the new boyfriend is now the ex-boyfriend? http://www.fuglyforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=115799&highlight=#115799 Barry
Some people are just stupid/sad/ignorant/publicity-seeking enough to confess to crimes they didn't commit. Here's just one googled example: http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060320/COLUMNISTS15/603200320/1048 All I'm saying is let's let the court proceedings take their course before we send out the lynch mob.
So then once he is convicted, you are up for a night ride with a rope? What scares me is that I believe that I could lynch him myself without shedding a tear. Maybe I have more callous than I care to admit. Barry
Nah, I actually have faith in the (Australian) court system to get it right most of the time, given that they are experts in their fields and have all the facts available to them, not just a few that have been hand-picked by the media. The US system, however, I think is more suspect. You elect your court officials for starters, don't you? That, to my mind, makes every high-profile case effectively a popularity contest. Not good for justice, that.
I understand your position chester, i'm all for a fair trial. But come on, he admitted to it AND they found her half-hacked body in his closet in a rubbermaid container. I think it's safe to presume he did something illegal. :roll: Now, take the little girl's corpse in his closet out of the equation, i'd be more concerned with the details of whether his confession was a lie or not. Especially concerned that someone would even lie about such a thing.
He had the right idea when he started working out. Working out will help clear up all those unwated chemicals in the brain that was driving him crazy. It's too bad he didin't have a work out buddy to keep him motivated or else this might not have happen. But now he can complain about his boring life in prison. I think his blogs will be complaining of rape in a whole new way.
Yep, safe to presume. But who knows? Maybe he got involved with some weird cult, and the maniacal Charles Manson style leader drugged him up and told him to do it. Or maybe the leader actually did the killing and just commanded him to stash the body. Highly, highly unlikely, right? But stranger things have happened. So let's have the trial, get all the facts, and then make an informed decision. Because you never know ...
I thought about how much our society is built on levels of transparency and participation that build trust in the system. You could argue different but by comparison from a world view perspective. One strategic achilles tendon type areas to attack is credibility. Then watch the house of cards fall. The Dems use it to influence people into distrusting the voting system. People like Smurf are all over it thinking themselves smart when really their just a pawn the real cheating is going on where he is not being told by the conspiracy press to look. Distrust in the legal system is very helpful in creating chaos. For example look at the high profile cases. Jon beneigh Ramsey for instance. What if the murder was not so much random but targeted. Well to do family something slightly odd sort of quirky. Generate a lot of press national attention. Do it professional style and no real reason to have a motive on anyone except the family itself as horrifying as that may be. In the end there is not enough evidence to prove but enough suspicion to get prosecution to try real hard to look to convict. Heinous enough to grip the nation for months with extreme desire for a conviction. Undertones of class warfare lending to the impression of a two sided legal system.
Speaking of insane conspiracy theories. Who's the man behind the curtain then Joe? Who's calling all the shots and co-ordinating this giant perfectly orchestrated liberal conspiracy?
