http://www.dumpalink.com/media/1140874936/Conspiracy_Documentary_ I saw this little video, it's got some out there ideas and all, but what really made me go :shock: was in the first 45 seconds. The driver did it? You'll probably have to watch it a few times. I don't doubt johnson knew it was going to happen, he was gonna be the next president after all, and if he didn't say anything about hearing or seeing it come from the driver then who'd even think to raise to question?
Yeah, Johnson leans back right before it happens, he isn't even looking at Kennedy. When Kennedy is shot in the head, he doesn't even look at him he just gets down.
And shot with a special "splat" bullet, so it would look like the exit wound. You see his head jerk back, it was hit from the front, and not from a sniper bullet from the back like the official story.
What the hell are you talking about? You're an idiot Schmed. Please review the parts in question a few more times. I don't give a damn about the rest of the video. That's the old Zepruder footage, and they had this whole fucking conversation numerous times way back in the day, too. But the majority of Americans never really got to see the footage, and after a while everybody just stopped giving a damn. I'm sure if you saw the crater that was supposed to be where Flight 93 crashed on 9/11, you'd be thinking "Geee, that looks like a missile's crater more than a fucking plane crash site." which is all it was, a 15 foot by 20 foot crater.
Oh you mean the old "splat" bullet trick, I gotcha. And I postd that P/11 video you wee talking about a long while back. The fact of the matter is, if the U.S. gov (or any other "superpower" it really dosn't matter who or what) was so entrenched in it's secercy that it was controling events and planning things 100's of years in the future, they would be competent enough to not let something as obvious as footage proving the driver shot kennedy leak anywhere. It would of been wiped out within hours of the actual event. And you flying off the handle calling me an idiot for playing devils advocate pretty much takes away any credibilty you had (which I think was none to begin with anyways..but I always try to givethe benefit of the doubt).
Or on another note, let's just say there was nothing else at all going on, that just some really powerful people wanted Kennedy dead. Do you really think that something as simple as some old video footage that could unmask the whole thing wouldn't of been taken care of? It's just absurd to think otherwise. I'm not saying nothing fishy was going on, but any real evidence has long since been taken care of. Or was it just a bunch of sloppy, unorganized, powermad retards getting away with this?
Me flying off the handle and calling you an idiot, and you saying that removes all of my credibility, doesn't change the fact that you're an idiot. The dude's footage was right fucking there, you can see JFK getting shot. You see the people on the sidewalk. Too many people had seen it and knew it was real before the shit could be contained. This footage has been around since the assassination days when making fake videos of this quality would have been nearly impossible. Just look at the shit. Yes, the ol' splat bullet trick, they're real. The bullet explodes on impact. It hit from the front, which is why the dude's head kicks back. They weren't really well known during the time, or at all, so no one thought about that. It's not just the Zepruder footage that shows his head kicking back, a lot of other ones do, which is why some people say there were two gunmen.
And apperantly you can't read. For one I asked a question, which you instead of answering or even addressing just called me an idiot. I'm not denying or affirming anyhting. It's all specualtion. But what I was saying is that I doubt that anything that could ever PROVE anything has long since been destroyed, so tighten up your tinfoil hat, watch old grainy distant videos and specualte all you want. But it's pointless, especially when your only arguement is "you're an idiot" anytime anyone challenges your narrow view of *ahem* reality. The stupid part of this whole thing is I was asking an honest question to begin with...*sighs* kids these days.....
You know better than to try and reason with him schmed. The only reason to reply to smurf is entertainment.
Schmed - reasoning with Smurf is like mud wrestling with a pig. It wastes your time, and the pig likes it. Barry
Just cuz I'm smurf doesn't mean the driver didn't do it :cry: Or the world ain't ending :cry: Tis' the plight of smurf!
Pigs are actually quite cleanly critters. And there is a chance Smurf will be off bonking his cousin while the rest of us lie radiating with the rest of the waste. Eaten by cockroaches and mutants. But Schmed should know that it would be possible to wanna off JFKennedy without controlling events a hundred years into the future. ( His speach nine days before gives enough reason to kill him, and moving the photocar and intimidating the texas police is definitely inside ). Robert Kennedy and Martin L Kings deaths within a month of eachother....
