Emily, Katrina, and Rita

Ok, so here's where the buuullshiiiiit kicks in...

There's more, but it's the same bullshit.

So the rubbing effect causes lightning? If that isn't the biggest load of bullshit I ever heard. Diogenes, oh keeper of all that is labeled wisdom, what do you think? Do you buy into this stupid shit these scientists are cramming down our throats?

 

That picture was Emily, by the way.

 

He is hiding in his barrel and insulting kings and such. But the flight of electrons come abour when differently charged layers mix. Vertical winds sounds like the thing :wink:

 

The black dots are dust on the lens

 

Oh man dude.... First of all, I don't buy that bullshit to begin with, that rubbing water molecules creates that charge, and the wind separates them. That's stupid, the shit is water, it's fluid, and the molecules would ground out long before then.

Remember, there is cloud to cloud, and cloud to ground. That energy is traveling downward. This is what hurricanes do and this is how they are formed. Giant electric vortices that funnel the shit downward.

There's a lot more energy going into this thing than you think, you got a 30 foot storm surge sitting under this thing, getting sucked up by the immensely low pressure, which is in turn boiling off all this water underneath it, and with the help of the cold tongue of air from the north is able to rid itself of this additional heat and continue sucking up moisture.

Usually the energy is able to flow through the clouds and through the low pressure eye, but when it builds up way too much in any one area and the attraction felt from another without as much reaches that critical point, it makes that connection and lightning strikes. Since it is travelling downward, you don't see any ground to air strikes.

 

Yeah probably, but it's funny how they didn't give the same readings for Katrina and Rita like they did for Emily.

And Wilma was out of the question, because it was over by Meh-hee-coo.

 

You have a theory Slapper ? is it the little Tlaloc s ?

 

I don't know what the hell that is, but I know there's more to it than what they're telling us.

I don't know if it's like this everywhere, but something that just started recently over here in Austin is I'm getting shocked by fucking static electricity all the damn time. My friends have noticed it to. You open your car door you get shocked, you go to open your front door you get shocked, you walk to your room door you get shocked, you touch someone else you get shocked, all the damn time everywhere you go.

 

I also don't doubt it has something to do with that shit fucking with the clouds, those pictures I showed you all.

 

Tlaloc is the aztec/mayan raingod. Tlalocs are te drops and the dew and the drench.
Maybe Tezla and Reich and the UFO would give you a god read.
There coming to take you away aha Hihi hoho to the funnyfarm where life is beautiful all the time and there coming to take you away !

But Willhelm Reichs rainmaker ! Seriously, as nonsense goes.
I mean its not like anybody serious believes that shit. :roll:

 

Well fine then, whatever the hell you're talking about is bullshit, why the fuck do I give a shit about that? I'm talking about what I'm talking about, and it's not bullshit.

 

Edison rules OK

 

Not OK, there are entire fields of science being hindered or hidden because we can't be allowed to know the truth of how they work. If we understood how the weather truly worked, that would open a whole 'nother can of worms.

 

Its impossible to do the math on the weather. Rule of increasing complexity. And why not Reichs orgon-rays ?

 

Once again, what the hell are you talking about? We can fucking observe the weather. Just like they measured the electric field about emily at 8 kilovolts per meter-squared, we can observe cause and effect, there are no rules against that. It just sounds like you're looking for excuses to stay stupid, or to explain why these scientists are playing dumb.

Don't they think they already figured out why a tornado works? Can you remember why according to what you learned in high school, off the top of your head? I know I couldn't because it was so stupid my brain had already purged it. But what prevents the wind from dispersing, and causes it to spin in place? There has to be a force there keeping it in place, and my bet is that force is electric.

 

Its impossible to do the math on the weather.
Rule of increasing complexity.

 

No it's not, you're an idiot. They don't have to figure out every fucking nook and cranny in a hurricane to know what it's doing as a whole.

 

From what I understand of lighting, most discharge is ground to air, so the statement made about why most hurricanes lack lighting doesn't make sense.
If all lightning is a byproduct of static electricity generated by fluid atmospheric currents moving over solid mass (I don't know if moving a fluid mass against a fluid mass generates static, but I wouldn't think so otherwise the ocean would carry a much larger charge then it does). It could also be that they have developed much more sensitive equipment, and the old perceptions they had of lightning in regards to hurricanes was based on incorrect and inaccurate data. However, seeing as how lightning is a build up of static electricity, and static electricity is more easily dissipated in humid and wet conditions, it would make sense that you would see less lightining in the event of a hurricane, because due to the extreme conditions the energy buildup may be discharged more rapidly, meaning that the same amount of electricity was being discharged, but just in a more constant and less violent means of realease. That explanation is subject to scrutiny though since thunderstorms occur more often in humid conditions than in dry. I would think it would have something to do with the amount of energy being released by the hurricane in relative proportion to a thunderstorm, which is generally humid conditions without the presence of strong winds and heavy rain. Did all of that make sense or am I sounding like XerxesX here?

 

just sounding like xerxes, not knowing what the hell you're talking about...

because there's your mistake.

I'm guessing the water molecules in the air were seriously rubbing up on the water below, and it happened that so much energy built up in the clouds, and way up high, because all the lightning is air to ground.

 

Then why would most of the lightning have centered around the eye of the storm, the one region without clouds?