My motive was to point out what, as it turns out, the article is pointing out anyway. I skim-read it, and didn't realise.
Yes the person who wrote the article had a pro global warming view. My point is directed at the credibility of such claims when their own facts are all over the charts. We could have a foot of snow in the Sahara desert and there would be articles illustrating how that it simply goes to show how obvious it is that we are in a phase of global warming.
True. "Climate change" is possibly a better expression, because as we pump more CO2 and pollutants into the atmosphere, some areas will get cooler, some wetter, some drier and some warmer. The overall trend, though, without a doubt, is towards warmer average temperatures, hence "global warming".
I'm talking about the big picture. Just look around at the recent rhetoric regarding global warming. They take basic arguments that one would use to show that there is no solid proof that global warming exists. And then spin it around like. "So there you have it its obvious one cannot deny we are all going to bake"
