Really I should say Obama says.... Over rules the city of Kinston NC's decision to remove party affiliation on the voting ballot. Says that black people need to see the "D" next to the name so that they know who to vote for otherwise they are being disenfranchised.
Really I should say Obama says.... Over rules the city of Kinston NC's decision to remove party affiliation on the voting ballot. Says that black people need to see the "D" next to the name so that they know who to vote for otherwise they are being disenfranchised. They are essentially saying at the Justice Department that black voters don't have the sense to understand who they're voting for, don't have any idea how to identify people they want to support unless the word "Democrat" is attached to their name. "The department ruled that white voters in Kinston will vote for blacks only if they are Democrats and that therefore the city cannot get rid of party affiliations for local elections because that would violate black voters' right to elect the candidates they want." So the Obama Justice Department has decided to insult nationally and brazenly the black population of Kinston, North Carolina. They are in effect saying, "No, no, no! You guys down there you cannot do this. Even though you voted 65% to get rid of party affiliation in local elections, you can't do it. You're going to have to identify who the Democrats are otherwise the black people won't know who to vote for." That's what the Obama Justice Department is saying. And it was Eric Holder said, wait a minute. We need to have a conversation about race. We're still "cowards about race" in this country. So you have here a 65% African-American district, a little town, Kinston, North Carolina, which voted overwhelmingly in favor of Obama, this same electorate passed a nonpartisanship provision by a two to one margin, yet the civil rights division of the Holder Justice Department decided it knew better and using an unconstitutional law "dictated its terms," like our moralizing attorney general likes to say. In things racial, we have always been and continue to be in too many ways essentially a nation of cowards. If that's true, then Eric Holder's own civil rights division is cowardice central. It shouldn't have taken much courage to let Kinston be Kinston. I don't know how else to say this. According to the Department of Justice, Barack Obama's Department of Justice, a majority black district has a right to have the candidates of its choice elected and would of course only ever choose Democrats but the district is one third white, and sometimes the vote of that one-third is decisive. And if you don't tell the white voters who the Democrats are, they might mistakenly vote for the Republicans. And if you don't tell the black voters who the Democrats are, they might mistakenly vote for Republicans. That would deny the black majority, the Democrats, the DOJ now say they are entitled to under the Constitution to win elections. So, here's the bottom line, folks. The bottom line: The Constitution compels the election of Democrats. The Constitution compels socialism. Remember, Obama's earlier lament from back in his days in Chicago, he was on some FM station. I think it was an FM radio station. I'm not sure, there were so many of them. We've played the audio. Cookie, you don't need to get me the audio. I'll just recite it. You people remember having heard it, his lament that the Warren Court did not go far enough in matters of redistribution of wealth. The Warren Court did not go far enough. So now they're simply ruling by fiat, here: Constitution compels the election of Democrats. The Constitution compels socialism. And even if black Democrats -- remember, they are 65% of the population in Kinston, North Carolina. Even if black Democrats in a small town want to run nonpartisan elections, Obama will not allow it. They don't know what's best for them. They must run as Democrats and get elected as Democrats. We're not going to have to any of this nonpartisan stuff. The bottom line is: It's an insult to their intelligence. No way will the black voters in Kinston, North Carolina, have any idea they're voting for Democrats unless it says "Democrat" next to their name.
Do you know what plagiarism is? Dude, I thought you were well spoken and intelligent but now I see that you use source material without quoting or citing the source. Does Rush Limbaugh know you have copied half the transcript of his radioshow? Dear Lord, do you really agree with Limbaugh enough to copy his hatred down into forums? The constitution compels socialsm? Are you out of your fucking mind? I read the rest of his rant here it is: " Just snap your fingers and make it so and just shut down the "sewer" that the Internet is. Shut it down! Shut down talk radio. Shut down Fox News. Then we could all have the kind of society Obama and his fellow anti-liberty, anti-private property, anti-constitutionalists want. Why go through all this angst? Why put everybody through this? Just do it. I mean, for crying out loud you're snapping your fingers and owning car companies and Wall Street and setting pay scales for everybody. Why not just outlaw the Republican Party? Rewrite the Constitution, require redistribution of wealth, get rid of talk radio. Get rid of it. Just do it. It's where you're headed anyway. Make it official. Show everybody." Touching isn't it? First he says that the constitution compels socialism, then he goes on saying that Obama is anti-constitutionalist. Sounds to me like a contradiction, I thought Rush said he didn't like the constitution to begin with(it compels socialism remember?); but Obama is the anti-constitutionalist? When Bush was in power, Rush used to tell people to support the president in times of war, no matter what, or you're unpatriotic. Recently he was quoted saying that he hopes Obama fails, what the fuck? How can you say that? If the president of the United States fails, the whole fucking country fails! He called the NFL racist and liberal, what the fuck? He made fun of Michael J Fox for having parkinson's, said he's faking it. When the Clintons were in the white house, he posted a picture of their 13 year old daughter saying that the white house had a new dog, what the fuck? Is Rush so low that he has to take cheap shots at a kid? Anyway, if he's your hero I can determine that your IQ is probably around 65. You know, lightly retarded. Maybe that's why you can't come up with information on your own and plagiarise other people's work.
Here is a link for you, might want to remember that when you worship at Rush's altar. http://www.fugly.com/videos/9964/colbert-slams-rush-limbaugh.html
Actually, it's illegal no matter where you reproduce the source material. Even with citations you are only allowed to copy 10% of someone's work in total. If Limbaugh is a stickler for copyright laws, our friend Joe could be in trouble or Fugly for hosting the content. Look it up. It is still lame to copy someone's shit and pass it as your own, it just proves that Joe isn't up to play with the big boys yet. Maybe there is only so much republicans can say to excuse their sorry asses.
You are really making an ass of yourself 1. If I wanted to plagiarize Rush then I would have re-written it enough to at least not make it so obvious. 2. Anyone who knows me well enough would see that I simply neglected to put the link to the Rush's page as I would do 90% of the time already. So get off you high horse and back to the fact of the issue. Democrats think black people are stupid. Democrats are the most racist people out there they take the black vote for granted they never re-pay them with any real progress just token b.s. to keep them on the plantation. LOL even half white black Democrats think the general black population to be stupid. I guess because they are more white.
Some dumbass wrote: Then the dumbass said: Then when you though it could not get worse and idiot said: 1. The dumbass talks of hatred but is unable to be forthcoming with any REAL examples. 2. Then he spoke of what he "thought" indicating to all observers that he does not thing to well. 3. In the end the stupid ass went off on a rant full of FALSE allegations apparently unaware of the fact that he could be sued for liable, character assassination or who knows what else. Probably one of those liberals who has a love for laws to shut other people up while he believes correctly himself to be not subject to the same laws.
You can't say that democrats are the most racist. Dude, this opens the door to so many fact checks it's not even funny. It's gonna take me a little while, but I promise you I will be back with a list of the most notorious klansmen and their political affiliations, the actual political demographic where the most hate crimes occur, the amount of black people in the republican party, etc... I'm gonna have a field trip with that comment. ps. I thought the south didn't want slavery to end, segregation to end, and is the heart of republican country... hmm... I wonder what that means
You thought wrong but that is OK you were indoctrinated by the Canadian public school system. Go ahead have at it this will be like shooting fish in a barrel.
If you want more examples of Limbaugh being a douchebag you will get a heaping plate of it. If you think I can be sued, then go ahead. I'm just curious to see exactly how that could work out. By the way, you failed to provide a link to your source, still liable for copyright infrigements. tsk tsk
So if someone tells you a joke, and you tell someone else the joke, but you dont give credit to the person that told you the joke, then you are a plagarist. Man, think of allllllll the lawsuits there could be for forwarding 'non-accredited' information. I mean jeeeeez, with the 'law' here we will all be arrested. Not to mention posting pictures and not giving credit to the photographer...
A joke is public domain but even comedians come under scrutiny sometimes, think of Carlos Mencia. Copyright is a form of intellectual property that gives the author of an original work exclusive right for a certain time period in relation to that work, including its publication, distribution and adaptation, after which time the work is said to enter the public domain. Copyright applies to any expressible form of an idea or information that is substantive and discrete and fixed in a medium. Some jurisdictions also recognize "moral rights" of the creator of a work, such as the right to be credited for the work. Copyright is described under the umbrella term intellectual property along with patents and trademarks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright "If it doesn't have a copyright notice, it's not copyrighted." This was true in the past, but today almost all major nations follow the Berne copyright convention. For example, in the USA, almost everything created privately and originally after April 1, 1989 is copyrighted and protected whether it has a notice or not. The default you should assume for other people's works is that they are copyrighted and may not be copied unless you know otherwise. There are some old works that lost protection without notice, but frankly you should not risk it unless you know for sure. http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html "If it's posted to Usenet it's in the public domain." False. Nothing modern and creative is in the public domain anymore unless the owner explicitly puts it in the public domain(*). Explicitly, as in you have a note from the author/owner saying, "I grant this to the public domain." Those exact words or words very much like them. http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html "If I make up my own stories, but base them on another work, my new work belongs to me." False. U.S. Copyright law is quite explicit that the making of what are called "derivative works" -- works based or derived from another copyrighted work -- is the exclusive province of the owner of the original work. This is true even though the making of these new works is a highly creative process. If you write a story using settings or characters from somebody else's work, you need that author's permission. http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html I hope I made my point
Be careful, there have been major crackdowns in recent months. Some university students in media, website design if memory serves right, got busted hard for using source material without citing. Say you write something down in this forum and it ends up on google, you're in shit if the author happens to see it. Wouldn't want to lose an adversary like yourself for plagiarism would I?
No actually you would cause your fag like that. But the funny part is I actually think you are serious which is laughable. Hilarious really the left wingers would love to "clean-up" the internet of opposing viewpoint this is true. And They think black people are stupid also. Did I mention that?
hmmmmmm Still seems to be 'school' related. So all those people at football games holding up scripture are going to get arrested for not citing the bible? This seems off topic. I think the only designation a ballot should have for an election of officials is which person is the incumbent. (I) thats all there 'needs' to be. Of course who would they vote for in the democratic primary????? with two Ds on the tab they might get confused, maybe they should put pictures on the ballot as well.
Damn straight Iam wants to distract from the fact that the "Law" says; "dumbass blacks need to see the "D" to know who to vote for." Not my words but Obama and Eric Holder.
