Enough people on the tv saying "There were no weapons&q

Discussion in 'More Serious Topics' started by Joeslogic, Nov 8, 2005.

  1. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
    There we go I knew you'd come around. It just takes a little research.
     
  2. smiles

    smiles New Member

    Messages:
    1,323
    ??? am i missing somethign here..... the article reported him as the NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR .......... white house says he's the NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR.... u sad he was a deputy to the post........ you discredited the article because you said they were wrong on that basic point....... you ..... were .... wrong... article.... was..... right.... neeener..... neeener..... neeeener
     
  3. Nursey

    Nursey Active Member

    Messages:
    7,378
    That's the problem with twisted snakes like Joeslogic. They don't play fair. Even when you have them in a corner, they'll behave as if they 'won', because they don't have any genuine interest in truth or justice...just 'winning'...or appearing to anyway.
     
  4. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
    Nursey wrote:

    Fact is he was Deputy Assistant to that position until Rice was promoted up to her position as I remember that fact that he was sworn in was new to me. While you Nursey of course take opportunity to attack me personally. An idea that is somewhat absurd for a person who condoned terrorism. Let’s focus on what is twisted about the article and the point that it is inferring.

    This quote taken out of context is meant to give the impression that the administration was wrong in believing Iraq at the time was attempting to restore its nuclear program as well as its chemical program and to hide its chemical weapons program. That is twisted. One only has to simply look at the facts to see that was true. Iraq was attempting all of this.

    Ask this one simple question:

    Did Saddam order his scientist to bury materials used in the production of chemical weapons, as well as nuclear weapons?

    The Joe Wilson inquiry proved as far as I’m concerned that Saddam was attempting to purchase yellow cake uranium, there is only one logical explanation for this taking place.

    Imagine that the administration story was that the sky was blue and it rained on Oct 15th 2001. Weather reports backed up the assertion that it rained, due to the fact that there was miner flooding in a small town that natural water source had dried up and this had made the headline news in that region. However nothing was said to confirm the sky was blue that day. Now for months the administration was being pounded by false allegations that the administration had lied and the sky was not blue on that day but red instead. Finally during a public address months later an independent person from within the administration being hounded once again says “ok then fine let’s just say we were wrong about the sky being blue. It might have been red for all we know but regardless of that point it did indeed rain that day.” Some American hater would be sitting on the sideline waiting to make that one statement the centerpiece of an article stating that Bush lied.

    Now to me that would be twisted indeed.

    I’ll refrain from calling your twisted Nursey and let the general reader of this forum make the decision weather or not that is the case.
     
  5. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
    Hillary Clinton in 2002 before voting to go to war in Iraq stated

    I would like to make a point of noting that Hillary Clinton is not a member of the Bush administration.
     
  6. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
    From the Weekly Standard:

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/804yqqnr.asp

    Neal Boortz paraphrased the points of that artical to this:
    Go ahead read it yourself
     
  7. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
    Thank God for Rush Limbaugh here from his webpage the very words of the Democrats many of which are now accusing the Bush Administration of Lying to the American public about WMD's. Remember these people were in a position to be privy to the intelligence reports the Bush administration referred to.

    http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/stacks/democrat.guest.html

     
  8. smurfslappa

    smurfslappa New Member

    Messages:
    1,361
    Who gives a fuck what Hillary Clinton said? She's no CIA agent or weapons inspector. OoOO, she's not part of the Bush administration, so she must be against it, like any party that ever made an advanced plan to maintain control of this country would rest all their hopes solely on this one group of individuals fucking things up right now. They got to have the backup, so when the peons get pissed and want to oust them, they can just send in the replacements and present a whole new set of policies and promise what the people want, while still following the same ol' plan.

    Anyways, my concern is with these assholes running the show, the same guys who're fucking with our history by sending their armies to Alexandria to burn libraries or who take other great measures to suppress our history. So fucked up, we don't even know which way is up anymore. I just hope we're the good guys, and not just on the winning team. Think of all the poor Star Trek nerds who'll some day find out that this is how interstellar wars are really fought, instead of with ships and sharks with frikkin' laserbeams attached to their heads. By undermining the foundation of one's empire: the serfs.

    You have the faith and manpower of your uneducated who believe that you are all-powerful, and thusly you keep them in check with things they don't understand. This is also why it's important to keep them stupid, because should they ever find out they've been duped and that they're people are being manipulated, well... no one likes that. Anyone seen Stargate? It's just a matter of informing someone they've been lied to, "Ye shall not surely die. For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods . . . . " Whada-What?! Man, and all this time he had me gathering up food, precious metals, and only the strongest souls, offering them up as sacrifice. Anyways, it's the ideal form of feudalism.
     
  9. ucicare

    ucicare Active Member

    Messages:
    5,606
  10. XerxesX

    XerxesX New Member

    Messages:
    745
    Much work is done to prevent the big one from coming. One failure of arab diplomacy is the lack of coherrent treaties. Its possible to read the right of agression against perpetrator into the Koran. This becomes a tragedy in face of modern strategical realities. The bagatelleof a fleasized area called israel becomes the stop to industrialization for most arab. Thanksto a few religious guys. ( And by the way, religion in a comunity is likely to be followed by powerty, ignorance and other diseases, mental , and through interaction, physical).
    Thusly, its considered imperative by the powers that be, to prevent an arab nuke. Personally i have to disagree. Believing that a nuclear arab nation would have to behave. This should be modified by the potential threat created by a plethora of nuclear powers and the potential fog of war.

    But! Then again.Who says its a crime to have the ability to defend ones country against USA and its allies ? And, why should the worst case scenario "bad boy" of democracies define the course of democratisation? After all, USA lacks a lot on its human rights record. You have a few "reporters" getting the message of revenge, old style, through on the box. Its not the death of a perpetrator i am conserned about.Its what happens to the executioners.Even if the killer "deserves" to die, you, the people of central northern america, do not deserve to be that backward.
     
  11. Samanthasez

    Samanthasez New Member

    Messages:
    1,545
    I think me and Joe should breed. I mean, what harm is there in a couple who would raise Indy-Righters? It could lead to Revolution.
    :oops:
     
  12. smiles

    smiles New Member

    Messages:
    1,323
    i think people who havent experienced just how right the right can go need to think before they speak
     
  13. smurfslappa

    smurfslappa New Member

    Messages:
    1,361
    I love how psychosis can either be A) someone who feels changed, or B) someone who hears voices or thinks they can manipulate someone elses thoughts. Those seem like two different things to me. But anyways, yeah ucicare. The first paragraph explains how I feel about Hillary Clinton or any other prominant figure the media loves to shed a warm light on. And for you to try to rag on someone who might feel changed after running a thread on how people can change seems a little contradictory. Maybe I believe there's much more to our history, and that I actually care to think about it.

    But on a different note, I was thinking about the Narayananastra and how it was a thought-seeking weapon. This would seem to me to maybe be something that would work on an ELF level, maybe? These GWEN towers, forcing someone into a certain rhythm, with them resisting and maybe fucking themselves up? I can't think of any other way it could work. I think there are a lot more truths in the Hindu religion than we give them credit for. The cow thing could of been planted by some asshole to discredit it.
     
  14. Samanthasez

    Samanthasez New Member

    Messages:
    1,545
    I know! It's a damn good thing those people aren't here.
     
  15. XerxesX

    XerxesX New Member

    Messages:
    745
    Samathasez sez
    I think me and Joe should breed. I mean, what harm is there in a couple who would raise Indy-Righters? It could lead to Revolution.

    You cant be RIGHT if you dont have a mind LEFT. Indjun rights ? Revolution is "impossible", since the price would be at least 90% of human pop, though that might save the remaining from extinction due to instinctive animal-like behaviour aka corrupt CAPITALISM The scenarios of the powers that be are locked. The needed coordination for such-scale manuvers are impossible. People ARE actually being watched if they start DOING something.
    A certain evolution might be possible. But more likely, TpowsTB will find it opportune to let the coming ecological disasters cover a few western
    ( Hrmph ) "dispositions" last hundred years or so. Thus ! Globacide !
     
  16. Joeslogic

    Joeslogic Active Member

    Messages:
    8,426
    :oops:
    You make me Blush Sam, The world could use a few more indi-right types. Although I believe there are more out there than you would tend to think. Its called the old silent majority. Albeit fewer with each new generation. They start indoctrinating the Smiley and Nursey types here with the Socialist union run public school system. When there not in school learning communism is cool there watching cartoons where all the good guys are tree huggers and socialists. At the same time anyone with a personality disorder is conservative. Then they get onto the internet and go to the Mike Moore web pages and get there daily dose of propaganda to keep themselves going.
     
  17. Nursey

    Nursey Active Member

    Messages:
    7,378
     
  18. smiles

    smiles New Member

    Messages:
    1,323
    it's posts like that which show how small of a grasp people have on reality..... they try to apply concepts that work in their daily lives to situations they've never experienced personally....
     
  19. XerxesX

    XerxesX New Member

    Messages:
    745
    Probably right again Joe. All american media is soon in the hands of the muskovites and their atheist servants. Did you really BELIEVE the commies surrenderd. They friggin try tellin us that man stems from apes and that the BIBLE is wrong.Communism threatens america. The evil hordes of cuba will soon overflow the brave defendants of libirdi. Just look at their war on christmas. A war on jesus is that. Lets hold hands and sing a happy song to keep the evil demonic commie hordes at bay. After all its not BIG BUSINESS that controls your society. :shock:
     
  20. XerxesX

    XerxesX New Member

    Messages:
    745
    Or to put it another way: Why do you refer to the monopolisation and controll by a few big companies, of media, heavy-production and energy as communism. ITS NOT CALLED COMMUNISM ! The real communism was starved to death because western powers attacked them as early as 1919 and continued to do untill its collapse. And yes ! Hitler DID recieve USgov funding for fighting against the commies. I suggest you replace your term communism for the term facism.
     

Share This Page