Enough people on the tv saying "There were no weapons&q

The liberal Media thinks if it puts enough people on the screen saying statements like "Everyone knows there was no WMD found in Iraq" they can essentially rewrite history. The push for rewriting history and the technique used has been honed and worked to a science. The Liberals own the media, public schooling (funded by tax payers), and public radio (funded by tax payers) as well as Higher educational institutes (indirectly funded by tax payers). When I was in high school the trend started there to emphasize on projects related to current events having students do reports on events occurring in the news media. They have advanced this technique since the 80s. The hope is if you repeat a lie often enough and convince the mass public that it is common knowledge that every one understands the truth being that lie. They then have essentially rewritten history before it ever became history. There trying to do that now with the no weapons of mass destruction statements on tv. As well as in the printed media and using that propaganda in the schools. A trick they learned from the Nazis. Separate the children from there families and influence there way of thinking. Worked very well for the Nazis training there little jr ss troops.

 

This goes for all of your posts. I would reply to them if i honestly thought that any argument, even the most compelling and factual could sway your stereotypical, hypocritical, and genuinely uninformed opinion towards any notion not already firmly fortified inside the hollowed out pumpkin you call a cranial cavity

 

I understand how you must feel realizing I'm right and made some really valid points. It's to post a comment when you feel like such a fool. If you want to stick to pposting with other brainwashed types just like yourself well it's not suprising to me.

 

yea that must be it..... :roll:

 

Re: Enough people on the tv saying "There were no weapo

Just curious Joe, how old are you?

You write like a late baby boomer. Say 1957?

Barry

 

38 actually. Son of a baby boomer. Almost got it. I actually identify with that generation really well I think though.

 

so joe?... the right is any different?/....


all look same.. all look same..

 

I’m independent actually. It is the imbalance of misinformation out there that bothers me. If the extreme end of the right wing had hijacked the party and the media was 85% right wing propaganda. And forums were full of misinformed robot right wingers I would be just as alarmed and you would hear me correcting the masses in there misguided ignorance. However that is not the case.

 

there isn't that much of an imbalance... you have the washington and new york posts and timeseses.. they pretty much balance each other out.. and most other cities and large towns have either both wings represented by newspapers.. or have papers that reflect their political bias.. (after all, a right wing paper won't sell in a staunchly left wing area)....

tv.. there is a slight leaning towards the left... but the right is represented ... most visibly by fox.. which isn't much to shout about i know..

radio.. well talk shows predominantly since music stations don't really do politics... well thats dominated by the right...

the government/judiciary.... right wing controlled..

internet forums... well they're populated by 'neal boortz spouting dittohead'esque morons of both political hues....

and i'm sure if you look at left leaning boards you'll see them crying about the vast right wing conspiracy too... same as the rights complain about the left....

divide and rule.. works every time

:wink:

 

The left knows the media is left biased they just lie for the sake of your grandchildren. It is there was of rewriting history. When your (if you ever have children) ... Lets just say when the next generation reads the history books there will plenty of references to right wing media bias placed out there by the left to actually change the perception of a generation that was not there and does not know better.

The media is extremely left biased just look at your guardian for example. People actually read that trash and pollute there minds with that propaganda.

 

but joe.. there is no left wing and right wing strictly speaking in america.. they're just fantasy constructs to polarise the people...

 

and you certainly cry a lot about the 'left' and spout lots of 'right wing views' for an indie-pedant

 

Let’s see Independent:
Less government intrusion
Less tax
Free market
Capitalism
Independents have a lot in common with conservatives.
And to add to it. I am against wholesale freedom of choice for abortion. This ties me even closer with them. The current administration is far to big government for me. I despised my former Governor from Tennessee Republican Don Sundquist (scumbag republican). I look fairly admirably at the current Tennessee governor Phil Bredesen for being an honestly middle road Democrat. (so far but I’m still skeptical).
No Pimp I’m an independent all right you just think that is supposed to mean I take no sides actually I side with the right most of the time.

 

well free market and capitalism is liberal... neo to be precise... and your anti muslim stance is pretty neo-conservative...

so you must be a neo-indie-pedant

 

homeboy can call himself whatever he wants he's still a self-righteous american ignoramus who can't keep his freedom fries out of things he could never understand

 

Self-righteous? Sure! American? Absolutely! Ignoramus well aren’t we getting a little testy here Smiley? I understand the freedom fries analogy I mean the French are pathetic so why wouldn’t the Americans want a different name? Maybe I’m being to harsh there are still some great French people out there remember I’m a free market capitalist and it was the French who coined the term “Laissez-faire”.
To stick to the subject, there were obviously weapons of mass destruction. It is so obvious that I refuse to believe that the media who are supposed to research there stories simply missed the obvious. The Dems are trying to change the obvious by putting faces and more faces on the TV with the same talking points. They believe if they repeat it enough it will be perceived as true.
Keeping my freedom fries out of things I could never understand? Look Smiles I do not have to degrade to your level of insult. This topic is about American political issues just as half tour posts are about. The irony about it is you are yourself a Serbian living in Canada for crying out loud! The Serbian part I find really fascinating and posed some serious questions to you about. The one thing you should be more of an authority than me on you do not want to talk about. Just a lot of anti American blah blah blah ………….

 

llalallalalal... you say media underplays what saddam has? maybe because for the last 4 years they've been hyping the people up with ridiculous alerts and propaganda that they'd become discredited among what i consider to be a majority of the populace, i mean who honestly still watches CNN or FOX.... i don't count the uninformed....... if you cant find iraq or afghanistan on a map then your opinion on the subject does not count...... dont get me started on american media coverage.... it's laughable for you to even suggest that they're not almost entirely government run... or at least VERY biased

 

There MIGHT have been some cans of mustard gas in Iraq. Even after 10 years of international boycott. In that case they were not found during or after invasion. Most likely, the MG was provided by a western nation during the early stages of the Irani-iraqi war.
Please remember that USnavy escorted supplyships in to Basra, while blocking export from the iranian coast. Even after a Iraqi Mig fired and hit a US-frigate by mistake. Now both Iraqis and Iranians have good reason to be pissed. They where both played by the west and primarily the USA. The threat of an alliance between these two regional powers is a strategically logical reason for the invasion.

 

XerxesX, you are apparently much uninformed. It just so happens that when we had inspectors there tons of chemicals were found and Iraq was ordered to dispose of these chemicals. Two conclusions can come of this, either to spite the world community America as well as the EU Saddam secretly disposed of these chemicals without anyone’s knowledge. Saddam hid the chemicals in or out of the country. I doubt that he would trust even Syria with a weapon that could be used against Iraq.

Smiley, we will just have to disagree you will go through life with blinders if the broad American hating (like yourself) consensus does not say it then it isn't true in your book. Notice I never mentioned anything about what they believe just what they say. They say what ever sort of derogatory crap they think will stick and damage an American politician that is not a socialist at heart.

 

By the way the pres is finally getting off of the ropes and defending himself against what I was saying all along. The lefts lies, the lies are gaining more credibility with all the talking heads incessantly repeating them over and over people ten to believe them because it would be soooo outrageous to lie about serious issues during war.
The opposition party more than happy to “split the baby” if that is what it takes to get there way. (I Kings 3:16)